Paragraph 5
According to the Tourism Authority of
Thailand, neither mango nor sticky rice is native
to Thailand.
Mangoes are native to Myanmar and
India, and sticky rice is commonly eaten in Laos,
which shares a border with Thailand.
This suggests
that the roots of the dish are probably a result of the mixing of
cultures in Southeast Asia.
Rice is usually thought of as a food
that is eaten as a meal, but its use as a dessert shows how
simple ingredients can create innovative, wonderful treats.
According to the Tourism Authority of Thailand, neither mango nor sticky rice is native to Thailand.

<according to ~>는 ‘~에 따르면’이라는 뜻이다.

<aneither A nor B>는 ‘A도 B도 아닌’이라는 뜻으로, mango와 sticky rice 둘 다를 부정한다.

Rice is usually thought of as a food that is eaten as a meal, but its use as a dessert shows how simple ingredients can create innovative, wonderful treats.

<be thought of as ~>는 ‘~로 여겨지다, ~로 생각되다’의 뜻이다.

how가 이끄는 절은 목적어로 쓰인 wh-명사절로 shows의 목적어로 쓰였다.

Read 해석

According to the Tourism Authority of Thailand, neither mango nor sticky rice is native to Thailand.
태국 관광청에 따르면, 망고도 찹쌀도 원산지가 태국이 아니다.
Mangoes are native to Myanmar and India, and sticky rice is commonly eaten in Laos, which shares a border with Thailand.
망고는 미얀마와 인도가 원산지이며, 찹쌀은 태국과 국경을 맞대고 있는 라오스에서 흔히 먹는다.
This suggests that the roots of the dish are probably a result of the mixing of cultures in Southeast Asia.
이는 이 요리의 근원지가 아마도 동남아시아의 문화가 혼합된 결과일 것임을 암시한다.
Rice is usually thought of as a food that is eaten as a meal, but its use as a dessert shows how simple ingredients can create innovative, wonderful treats.
쌀은 보통 식사로 먹는 음식으로 생각되지만, 그것의 디저트로의 활용은 간단한 재료가 얼마나 혁신적이고 멋진
간식을 만들 수 있는지 보여 준다.
전체 해석보기
문장별 해석보기
듣기