1
2
What kinds of physical activity do you do regularly?
Sample I do stretching for 10 minutes every morning.
l
London Transport Workers Study
Paragraph 1
In the busy London streets of 1953, a special study was conducted.
Scientists observed more than 31,000 people who had various jobs on buses and trains.
Some jobs demanded lots of moving around, like ticket collectors, while others, like drivers, didn’t require much movement.
What was interesting was that the workers with more active jobs had fewer heart problems than
those who sat a lot.
This implied that jobs requiring more moving around were healthier for workers than those jobs that didn’t.

What could account for the difference in their health outcomes?
What was interesting was that the workers with more active jobs had fewer heart problems than those who sat a lot.

관계대명사 What이 이끄는 명사절 What was interesting이 문장의 주어로 쓰였다.

fewer heart problems than those who sat a lot은 「비교급 + than」의 형태인 비교 구문이 사용되었고, those는 주격 관계대명사인 who의 선행사로, 앞서 나온 the workers를 지칭한다.

Read 해석

Approach to a Healthy Life
건강한 삶으로 향하는 길
London Transport Workers Study
런던 교통 근로자 연구
In the busy London streets of 1953, a special study was conducted.
1953년 번화한 런던 거리에서 특별한 연구가 진행되었다.
Scientists observed more than 31,000 people who had various jobs on buses and trains.
과학자들은 버스와 기차에서 다양한 직업을 가진 31,000명 이상의 사람을 관찰했다.
Some jobs demanded lots of moving around, like ticket collectors, while others, like drivers, didn’t require much movement.
매표원 같은 어떤 직업은 많은 움직임을 요구한 반면에 운전사 같은 다른 직업은 많은 움직임이 필요하지 않았다.
What was interesting was that the workers with more active jobs had fewer heart problems than those who sat a lot.
흥미로운 점은 활동적인 직업을 가진 근로자가 많이 앉아 있는 근로자보다 심장 질환이 더 적었다는 점이다.
This implied that jobs requiring more moving around were healthier for workers than those jobs that didn’t.
이는 더 많이 움직여야 하는 직업이 그렇지 않은 직업보다 근로자의 건강에 더 좋다는 것을 암시했다.
What could account for the difference in their health outcomes?
그들의 건강 결과의 차이를 설명할 수 있는 요인은 무엇일까?
전체 해석보기
문장별 해석보기
듣기